The following are favorite thoughts that Lou Dobbs recently shared on his CNN evening news show on the issue of immigration. They are taken from a letter written in 1919 by a U.S. president to the American Defense Society:
"In the first place we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the man's becoming in very fact an American, and nothing but an American...
"There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag, and this excludes the red flag, which symbolizes all wars against liberty and civilization, just as much as it excludes any foreign flag of a nation to which we are hostile...We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language...and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people."
--Theodore Roosevelt, 1919
Friday, March 31, 2006
Wednesday, March 29, 2006
The Pander Sweepstakes
The race is on for the new Panderer-in-Chief. Pres. George Bush's "Jesus is the philosopher I most admire" style of election pandering to his right-wing religious base now seems tepid stuff.
Presidential wannabes are hotly vying for the Panderer-in-Chief crown.
Doctor-Senator Bill Frist (R-TN) had jumped out in front with his senate-floor-announced video diagnosis of Terry Schiavo, playing to the meddling religious right. But he over-pandered by opposing the Bush administration ports deal....then made a quick turn-around after a trip to the Bush Wood House, pander crown askew. He's currently trying to pander the illegal immigration issue and is testing the wind.
Eager to grab the Panderer-in-Chief crown, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) has marched one-half step behind Bush since the tarring Bush inflicted on him during the last presidential primary. To prove he was worthy of the Bush-adoring base, McCain threw his support in the recent presidential candidate straw poll to........(drum roll)......Bush the Can't-Run-Again. McCain is currently pandering on both sides of many issues.
Almost on the brink of awarding the Panderer-in-Chief crown, we were drawn from the brink by a pander trifecta. So audacious, so multi-faceted was this pander it left the others in a cloud of brown dust.
On pending tough illegal immigration legislation......"It is certainly not in keeping with my understanding of the Scripture because this bill would literally criminalize the Good Samaritan and probably even Jesus himself!".......Sen. Hillary Clinton, (D-NY) March 22, 2006 as reported in The New York Times.
Wow! A pander to the religious, to the (someday voting) illegal immigrants and to what she perceives as her Democrat base.
Hillary wins. Crown her Panderer-in-Chief!
But don't support her candidacy for the highest office in the land.
We can do much better.
Presidential wannabes are hotly vying for the Panderer-in-Chief crown.
Doctor-Senator Bill Frist (R-TN) had jumped out in front with his senate-floor-announced video diagnosis of Terry Schiavo, playing to the meddling religious right. But he over-pandered by opposing the Bush administration ports deal....then made a quick turn-around after a trip to the Bush Wood House, pander crown askew. He's currently trying to pander the illegal immigration issue and is testing the wind.
Eager to grab the Panderer-in-Chief crown, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) has marched one-half step behind Bush since the tarring Bush inflicted on him during the last presidential primary. To prove he was worthy of the Bush-adoring base, McCain threw his support in the recent presidential candidate straw poll to........(drum roll)......Bush the Can't-Run-Again. McCain is currently pandering on both sides of many issues.
Almost on the brink of awarding the Panderer-in-Chief crown, we were drawn from the brink by a pander trifecta. So audacious, so multi-faceted was this pander it left the others in a cloud of brown dust.
On pending tough illegal immigration legislation......"It is certainly not in keeping with my understanding of the Scripture because this bill would literally criminalize the Good Samaritan and probably even Jesus himself!".......Sen. Hillary Clinton, (D-NY) March 22, 2006 as reported in The New York Times.
Wow! A pander to the religious, to the (someday voting) illegal immigrants and to what she perceives as her Democrat base.
Hillary wins. Crown her Panderer-in-Chief!
But don't support her candidacy for the highest office in the land.
We can do much better.
Tuesday, March 28, 2006
Bush Bunch Rates an "F"
Our Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld told his audience at the Army War College yesterday that the United States rates a "D" grade for its efforts to counter ideological support for terrorism....the war of ideas.
He said he thinks it is because the country has "not found the formula" for countering the extremists message.
Actually it is much simpler than that.
Just like our children, countries and peoples learn by example.
What has been our "democratic" example?
An erosion of citizen civil rights, court and machine-rigged elections, "our way or the highway" foreign policy, corporate takeover of governmental policies, dismantling of the middle class, "elephant in the china shop" wars of choice, arrogant and corrupt politicians ignoring the electorate.
Only when our example matches our rhetoric will the message take hold.
This can't happen while we tolerate the Bush bully-boys.
He said he thinks it is because the country has "not found the formula" for countering the extremists message.
Actually it is much simpler than that.
Just like our children, countries and peoples learn by example.
What has been our "democratic" example?
An erosion of citizen civil rights, court and machine-rigged elections, "our way or the highway" foreign policy, corporate takeover of governmental policies, dismantling of the middle class, "elephant in the china shop" wars of choice, arrogant and corrupt politicians ignoring the electorate.
Only when our example matches our rhetoric will the message take hold.
This can't happen while we tolerate the Bush bully-boys.
Monday, March 27, 2006
Bush the Unready
The White House, January 31, 2003, two months before the invasion of Iraq. A meeting was held between President George W. Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair.
Richard Norton-Taylor writing for the UK Guardian Unlimited reviews the contents of a memo of that meeting as printed in a new edition of Lawless World by Prof. Phillipe Sands. Ponder these nuggets:
- Bush intended to invade whether or not there was a second UN resolution and even if UN inspectors found no evidence of a banned Iraqi weapons program.
- Bush told Blair, "The diplomatic strategy had to be arranged around the military planning."
- Bush told Blair that the US was so worried about the failure to find hard evidence against Saddam that they thought of "flying US reconnaissance aircraft planes with fighter cover over Iraq, painted in UN colors." and Bush added, "If Saddam fired on them, he would be in breach [of UN resolutions]."
- Bush said that it was "unlikely that there would be internecine warfare between the different religious and ethnic groups."
Blair sent John Sawers as an envoy to Baghdad in the aftermath of the invasion as reported this March by the Guardian. Sawers sent Blair a series of confidential memos in May and June of 2003 describing the US postwar administration in Baghdad as "an unbelievable mess.....No leadership, no strategy, no coordination, no structure and inaccessible to ordinary Iraqis."
We were march-stepped into the war with Iraq by Bush the Unready who was determined to have his way at any cost and by any means.
As for the aftermath.......Bush is all strut and no direction.
Saturday, March 25, 2006
Can We Float a $9 Trillion Boat?
Steve Sack/Minneapolis Star Tribune
"...our budget will run a deficit that will be small and short-term..."
President Bush, State of the Union, January 2002.
"...we can cut the deficit in half over the next five years."
President Bush, State of the Union, January 2003
"...we can cut the deficit in half over the next five years."
President Bush, State of the Union, January 2004
"I will send you a budget that holds the growth of discretionary spending below inflation, makes tax relief permanent, and stays on track to cut the deficit in half by 2009."
President Bush, State of the Union, January 2005
"...and stay on track to cut the deficit in half by 2009."
President Bush, State of the Union, January 2006
The Bush administration inherited a ten-year budget surplus of $5.6 trillion.
In March of 2006 the Bush administration and the GOP Congress raised the debt ceiling to nearly $9 trillion.
Heck of a job Dubya.
"...our budget will run a deficit that will be small and short-term..."
President Bush, State of the Union, January 2002.
"...we can cut the deficit in half over the next five years."
President Bush, State of the Union, January 2003
"...we can cut the deficit in half over the next five years."
President Bush, State of the Union, January 2004
"I will send you a budget that holds the growth of discretionary spending below inflation, makes tax relief permanent, and stays on track to cut the deficit in half by 2009."
President Bush, State of the Union, January 2005
"...and stay on track to cut the deficit in half by 2009."
President Bush, State of the Union, January 2006
The Bush administration inherited a ten-year budget surplus of $5.6 trillion.
In March of 2006 the Bush administration and the GOP Congress raised the debt ceiling to nearly $9 trillion.
Heck of a job Dubya.
Friday, March 24, 2006
Bush Sneaky Bahamas Ports Deal
Here we go again!
Before the dust even settles......on the United Arab Emirates-owned Dubai Ports World deal for the management of or a presence in 24 U.S. ports; and, the Inchcape Shipping Services deal involving more than a dozen U.S. ports and our U.S. Navy ship schedules....we have uncovered the latest Bush administration "deal" as reported by the Associated Press.
And, such a deal, for China.
Of course, the Chinese military already manage the Panama Canal and a deep-sea port in Los Angeles. Not satisfied with these security risks, the Bush administration has hired, with a no-bid contract, the Hong Kong conglomerate Hutchison Whampoa Ltd, to run a sophisticated U.S. radiation detector for cargo passing through the Bahamas to the United States and elsewhere.
And, there will be no American customs agents present.
Supervised by Bahamian customs officials, Hutchison employees will drive the towering, truck-like radiation scanner over large cargo containers looking for radiation that might be emitted by plutonium or a radiological weapon.
The billionaire chairman of Hutchison, Li Ka-Shing, is described by Larry M. Wortzel of the U.S. Commission who studies China security and economic issues as "pretty close to a lot of senior leaders of the Chinese government and the Chinese Communist party." Others not so touchy about administration reaction just say his firm has ties to China's armed forces.
A U. S. military 1999 intelligence report once marked "secret" cited Hutchison's port operations as a potential risk for smuggling arms and other prohibited materials into the United States from the Bahamas.
Whoa!
Where are our Senators on this? Who reviewed this deal? Why are we so stupid?
The Bush administration has convinced us that terrorists are everywhere just waiting to hurt and destroy us. So why are they continuing to keep us at risk with their ports, borders and illegal immigration policies?
Just who is in charge anyway?
The increasingly dawning reality seems to be "no one."
Or, at least no one with our best national interests in mind.
Before the dust even settles......on the United Arab Emirates-owned Dubai Ports World deal for the management of or a presence in 24 U.S. ports; and, the Inchcape Shipping Services deal involving more than a dozen U.S. ports and our U.S. Navy ship schedules....we have uncovered the latest Bush administration "deal" as reported by the Associated Press.
And, such a deal, for China.
Of course, the Chinese military already manage the Panama Canal and a deep-sea port in Los Angeles. Not satisfied with these security risks, the Bush administration has hired, with a no-bid contract, the Hong Kong conglomerate Hutchison Whampoa Ltd, to run a sophisticated U.S. radiation detector for cargo passing through the Bahamas to the United States and elsewhere.
And, there will be no American customs agents present.
Supervised by Bahamian customs officials, Hutchison employees will drive the towering, truck-like radiation scanner over large cargo containers looking for radiation that might be emitted by plutonium or a radiological weapon.
The billionaire chairman of Hutchison, Li Ka-Shing, is described by Larry M. Wortzel of the U.S. Commission who studies China security and economic issues as "pretty close to a lot of senior leaders of the Chinese government and the Chinese Communist party." Others not so touchy about administration reaction just say his firm has ties to China's armed forces.
A U. S. military 1999 intelligence report once marked "secret" cited Hutchison's port operations as a potential risk for smuggling arms and other prohibited materials into the United States from the Bahamas.
Whoa!
Where are our Senators on this? Who reviewed this deal? Why are we so stupid?
The Bush administration has convinced us that terrorists are everywhere just waiting to hurt and destroy us. So why are they continuing to keep us at risk with their ports, borders and illegal immigration policies?
Just who is in charge anyway?
The increasingly dawning reality seems to be "no one."
Or, at least no one with our best national interests in mind.
Wednesday, March 22, 2006
Heeeeere's Georgie
The White House thinks it's onto something.....since they can't sell policy on substance, go for appearance!
So......Heeeeeeeere's Georgie!
Maybe the White House is getting its political ideas from the last episode of West Wing where Alan Alda, playing a falling-polls Presidential Candidate (GOP by the way), holds a long in-your-face press conference and turns public opinion.
Presto change-o! Polls heading up!
An increasingly unpopular Georgie needed something, especially since his public opinion handlers have had him singing the one note "Everything's Great" song. So, why not try the West Wing approach, a besieged politician holding forth brilliantly and turning the tide.
Problem is, Bush roving around the country with his mike doesn't come off as presidential.......it's more like a frat boy on a non-musical karaoke tour.
Wonder if this flippant approach will salve the Iraq war-Katrina disaster-lost jobs grief of the nation. Or win the lost admiration of our former allies. Or start to reverse the plunging national budget and trade deficits. Or stem illegal immigration and secure our ports and borders.
Why doesn't Bush just get to work and DO something? Few are buying his act anyway.
And Bush.....you're no Alan Alda.
So......Heeeeeeeere's Georgie!
Maybe the White House is getting its political ideas from the last episode of West Wing where Alan Alda, playing a falling-polls Presidential Candidate (GOP by the way), holds a long in-your-face press conference and turns public opinion.
Presto change-o! Polls heading up!
An increasingly unpopular Georgie needed something, especially since his public opinion handlers have had him singing the one note "Everything's Great" song. So, why not try the West Wing approach, a besieged politician holding forth brilliantly and turning the tide.
Problem is, Bush roving around the country with his mike doesn't come off as presidential.......it's more like a frat boy on a non-musical karaoke tour.
Wonder if this flippant approach will salve the Iraq war-Katrina disaster-lost jobs grief of the nation. Or win the lost admiration of our former allies. Or start to reverse the plunging national budget and trade deficits. Or stem illegal immigration and secure our ports and borders.
Why doesn't Bush just get to work and DO something? Few are buying his act anyway.
And Bush.....you're no Alan Alda.
Bush: Leave It For The Next Guy
President Bush in his press conference yesterday stated emphatically about the ongoing bloodbath in Iraq, "I see progress." The public isn't sold.
We're reminded of the story the Los Angeles Times ran last November about the U.S. military covertly paying to have positive stories run in the Iraqi press. The Pentagon contracted with a firm called the Lincoln Group to help translate and place "feel good" stories.
The Bush administration's propaganda arm at work.
This was happening while the U.S. was trumpeting the promotion of democratic principles, political transparency and freedom of speech in Iraq.
So.....is it any wonder the U.S. public is skeptical about the "I see progress" spin?
And, do you remember the Cuban boat immigration crisis that George the greater left to President Clinton? Guess George the lesser learned at daddy's knee because he said yesterday that the issue of removing U.S. troops from Iraq "will be decided by future presidents and future governments of Iraq."
Say what! Bush has nearly three more years to serve as president!
Just leave the mess to the next guy! Guess that is Bush's idea of Iraq war strategy.
And now that I think about it, that is the Bush administration's trade and budget deficit policies also. Our children and grandchildren will have to clean that mess up too, if they can.
We can slow down the Bush administration demolition ball this November. We must loosen the GOP grip on all three branches of our government. Let's start with Congress in November.
VOTE!
We're reminded of the story the Los Angeles Times ran last November about the U.S. military covertly paying to have positive stories run in the Iraqi press. The Pentagon contracted with a firm called the Lincoln Group to help translate and place "feel good" stories.
The Bush administration's propaganda arm at work.
This was happening while the U.S. was trumpeting the promotion of democratic principles, political transparency and freedom of speech in Iraq.
So.....is it any wonder the U.S. public is skeptical about the "I see progress" spin?
And, do you remember the Cuban boat immigration crisis that George the greater left to President Clinton? Guess George the lesser learned at daddy's knee because he said yesterday that the issue of removing U.S. troops from Iraq "will be decided by future presidents and future governments of Iraq."
Say what! Bush has nearly three more years to serve as president!
Just leave the mess to the next guy! Guess that is Bush's idea of Iraq war strategy.
And now that I think about it, that is the Bush administration's trade and budget deficit policies also. Our children and grandchildren will have to clean that mess up too, if they can.
We can slow down the Bush administration demolition ball this November. We must loosen the GOP grip on all three branches of our government. Let's start with Congress in November.
VOTE!
Tuesday, March 21, 2006
Measure Bush By Deeds Not Words
Duffy at The Des Moines Register"President Bush says America has caused an incredible transformation in Afghanistan. He said everything's being rebuilt, people are getting jobs, kids are going back to school. He said it works so well that he's thinking of trying it in New Orleans."
--Jay Leno
On the sober side. Bush is doing his version of a tour de force in meetings around the country in support of the war. He says in his smirk-wink buddy-the-president delivery that things are "lookin' up in Iraq."
Yet Tim Russert said on the Don Imus show this morning that when you try to make a hotel reservation in southern Iraq the phones are answered in Persian, the language of Iran.....and that Iran is financing the building of an airport in Najaf which is 90 miles south of Baghdad.
As reported in the Washington Post last year, Iran is providing the estimated $20 to $25 million low-interest loan to build the airport which will serve religious pilgrims traveling to and from Iran. Najaf is a holy center for Shiite Muslims.
So the U.S. projected $1 trillion cost of the war in Iraq has been a lavish gift to Iran. Iran is now accomplishing in a war-weakened Iraq what they couldn't after years of warfare between the two countries.......a foothold in Iraq from which to pursue their religious and political aspirations.
We now have the terrorist organization of Hamas running Palestine and the Iranian ayatollahs planted in southern Iraq.
Ask yourself this, are you and the world safer now than you were before the Bush neo-cons took over U.S. foreign policy?
.
Monday, March 20, 2006
No More Iraq Cheneyisms
President Bush, Vice President Cheney and US military commander in Iraq, Gen. Casey, Jr. voiced upbeat appraisals of the progress being made in Iraq on the third anniversary of the US-led invasion of Iraq.
Yet former Iraqi prime minister, Ayad Allawi, says his nation is in the throes of civil war and edging toward the "point of no return" as reported in the Washington Post. US Senators on both sides of the isle echo this assessment.
Who to believe? An administration who roundly denounced former President Clinton's nation building efforts but is making that the centerpiece....read justification....for their strategic foreign policy. Their wrong assertions about the Saddam Hussein link to 9/11, Iraq's weapons of mass destruction, Bush's carrier-announced victory, the cost of the war. Spin raised to the level of propaganda.
The war on terrorism was supposedly launched in response to 9/11.....Osama Bin Laden.....when is the last time you heard the administration's progress report on him?
We've made a mess of what Cheney describes as our "aggressive, forward--leaning" Iraq strategy, arguably the worst blunder in our nation's history.
What we need from this administration is a sober assessment and an exit strategy, not more Bush pep talks and rosy Cheneyisms.
Yet former Iraqi prime minister, Ayad Allawi, says his nation is in the throes of civil war and edging toward the "point of no return" as reported in the Washington Post. US Senators on both sides of the isle echo this assessment.
Who to believe? An administration who roundly denounced former President Clinton's nation building efforts but is making that the centerpiece....read justification....for their strategic foreign policy. Their wrong assertions about the Saddam Hussein link to 9/11, Iraq's weapons of mass destruction, Bush's carrier-announced victory, the cost of the war. Spin raised to the level of propaganda.
The war on terrorism was supposedly launched in response to 9/11.....Osama Bin Laden.....when is the last time you heard the administration's progress report on him?
We've made a mess of what Cheney describes as our "aggressive, forward--leaning" Iraq strategy, arguably the worst blunder in our nation's history.
What we need from this administration is a sober assessment and an exit strategy, not more Bush pep talks and rosy Cheneyisms.
Sunday, March 19, 2006
This is Such a Bad Idea!
Senators Tom Harkin (D-IA) and Arlen Specter (R-PA) are talking about a plan to move $7 billion from the 2008 budget to the 2007 budget for spending on labor, health and human services.
That would mean we would not only run up deficits against our current budget, we would be creating deficits against budgets yet unborn!
Lunacy!
Even Specter says "It's not sort of a gimmick. It is a gimmick." And a bad idea.
That would mean we would not only run up deficits against our current budget, we would be creating deficits against budgets yet unborn!
Lunacy!
Even Specter says "It's not sort of a gimmick. It is a gimmick." And a bad idea.
An Idea Whose Time is Past Due
Rep. Steve King (R- IA) proposes a winning idea for congressional reform!
The text of all bills considered by Congress must be posted on the Internet at least 48 hours before votes. "We must shine sunlight onto the process," King said.
Yes! A step toward transparency in government.
At least this 48 hour notice would expose bad ideas and with ports-type of activism could nip them in the bud.
Let Rep. King and all of your representatives know you support this initiative!
The text of all bills considered by Congress must be posted on the Internet at least 48 hours before votes. "We must shine sunlight onto the process," King said.
Yes! A step toward transparency in government.
At least this 48 hour notice would expose bad ideas and with ports-type of activism could nip them in the bud.
Let Rep. King and all of your representatives know you support this initiative!
Friday, March 17, 2006
China and Cold War
The Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines "cold war" as:
1: A conflict over ideological differences carried on by methods short of sustained overt military action and usually without breaking off diplomatic relations, and;
2: A condition of rivalry, mistrust, and often open hostility short of violence especially between power groups.
Consider then the war of words, increasing tensions and military posturing by one superpower, the United States, and one undoubtedly soon-to-be superpower, China. A few things to ponder.....
Recently U. S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice lectured China about it's need to show greater transparency regarding its reported increased military budget and secretive military buildup since 1996. (One can't help but wonder about the Bush administration disconnect on what they practice opposed to what they preach regarding transparency in government.)
China will soon have more attack submarines than the United States including the addition of 4 Russian Kilo-class subs.
Our neighbor in South America, Venezuela, has threatened to curtail their oil exports to the U. S. while it has doubled its imports of oil to China. Venezuela currently supplies 10 per cent of U. S. oil imports.
In August of 2005 Russia and China's armed forces launched their first major joint war games. Submarines, bombers armed with cruise missiles, warships and 10,000 military personnel simulated an invasion of a peninsula on the Yellow Sea south-east of Beijing. China is Russia's biggest customer for its arms industry. http://telegraph.co.uk/news
Not to be outdone, the U.S. announced it will hold one of its biggest naval exercises in the Asia Pacific this summer. Several carrier strike groups including at least three warships and an attack submarine will conduct large-scale operations. In all, four carriers would be involved in three military maritime exercises.
It has been ten years since four U. S. aircraft carriers have operated in the Pacific Ocean at one time and could be the largest combined aircraft carrier operations there since the Vietnam War.
http://www.spacewar.com/reports
China has been singled out by the Pentagon as the country with the greatest potential to challenge the United States militarily.
And.....the U.S. trade deficit increased in January to $68.5 billion, the largest monthly deficit in the nation's history. The trade deficit with China increased from $16.3 billion in December of 2005 to $17.9 billion in January. http://www.census.gov/indicator/www/ustrade.html
So, why are we allowing the U.S. trade dollar to fuel China's economic (and thus military) boom while unleashing oceans of red ink on our own economy?
Note to the Bush administration....why not stop lecturing China....they don't listen anyway..... and start formulating a few policies of our own? Like addressing our trade deficit.
The build-up is on! The Cold War is right behind, if not already here.
1: A conflict over ideological differences carried on by methods short of sustained overt military action and usually without breaking off diplomatic relations, and;
2: A condition of rivalry, mistrust, and often open hostility short of violence especially between power groups.
Consider then the war of words, increasing tensions and military posturing by one superpower, the United States, and one undoubtedly soon-to-be superpower, China. A few things to ponder.....
Recently U. S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice lectured China about it's need to show greater transparency regarding its reported increased military budget and secretive military buildup since 1996. (One can't help but wonder about the Bush administration disconnect on what they practice opposed to what they preach regarding transparency in government.)
China will soon have more attack submarines than the United States including the addition of 4 Russian Kilo-class subs.
Our neighbor in South America, Venezuela, has threatened to curtail their oil exports to the U. S. while it has doubled its imports of oil to China. Venezuela currently supplies 10 per cent of U. S. oil imports.
In August of 2005 Russia and China's armed forces launched their first major joint war games. Submarines, bombers armed with cruise missiles, warships and 10,000 military personnel simulated an invasion of a peninsula on the Yellow Sea south-east of Beijing. China is Russia's biggest customer for its arms industry. http://telegraph.co.uk/news
Not to be outdone, the U.S. announced it will hold one of its biggest naval exercises in the Asia Pacific this summer. Several carrier strike groups including at least three warships and an attack submarine will conduct large-scale operations. In all, four carriers would be involved in three military maritime exercises.
It has been ten years since four U. S. aircraft carriers have operated in the Pacific Ocean at one time and could be the largest combined aircraft carrier operations there since the Vietnam War.
http://www.spacewar.com/reports
China has been singled out by the Pentagon as the country with the greatest potential to challenge the United States militarily.
And.....the U.S. trade deficit increased in January to $68.5 billion, the largest monthly deficit in the nation's history. The trade deficit with China increased from $16.3 billion in December of 2005 to $17.9 billion in January. http://www.census.gov/indicator/www/ustrade.html
So, why are we allowing the U.S. trade dollar to fuel China's economic (and thus military) boom while unleashing oceans of red ink on our own economy?
Note to the Bush administration....why not stop lecturing China....they don't listen anyway..... and start formulating a few policies of our own? Like addressing our trade deficit.
The build-up is on! The Cold War is right behind, if not already here.
Thursday, March 16, 2006
The Congressional Tallies
Rather than point out the irresponsibility of raising the U.S. debt ceiling.....to almost $9 trillion.......that is currently being approved by the GOP senate....... (that is 67% of our annual GNP).........
Or the Bush administration saber-rattling, nation-building renewed national security strategy of preemptive war........
Or the refusal of the committee investigating the Katrina hurricane disaster to subpoena documents and testimony from Bush aides since the White House has put those people involved "off limits" to the committee.......
I'm instead going to share with you the URL for a fascinating Washington Post.com site that reviews all congressional votes since 1991. You can find out what the bill was about and how each of the senators and representatives voted. Fascinating.
Now, enjoy March Madness....the basketball tournament.......not the Bush administration policies!
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/?referrer=email
Or the Bush administration saber-rattling, nation-building renewed national security strategy of preemptive war........
Or the refusal of the committee investigating the Katrina hurricane disaster to subpoena documents and testimony from Bush aides since the White House has put those people involved "off limits" to the committee.......
I'm instead going to share with you the URL for a fascinating Washington Post.com site that reviews all congressional votes since 1991. You can find out what the bill was about and how each of the senators and representatives voted. Fascinating.
Now, enjoy March Madness....the basketball tournament.......not the Bush administration policies!
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/?referrer=email
Wednesday, March 15, 2006
Bush Spins While Dubai Buys
Good old Yankee common sense tells us that it is dangerous and wrong for a foreign government to be in charge of any of our seaports.
But common sense, and truthful motives, are in short supply in the Bush administration. We are now in a tornado of Dubai World Ports and United Arab Emirates spin by the Bush administration.
We are being told that Americans who object to this deal are Arab and Muslim bashing bigots. That we are destroying our trade relations with the Middle Eastern world. That Dubai Ports World used to support terrorist states, but since 9/11 they are our fast friends (see my "UAE Not US Supporter Since 9/11" and "Portsgate: Public Outrage be Damned" blogs). And most absurd, that there are more important issues.
More important than the security of our ports and borders?
According to a small article in the recent TIME magazine, there is yet another Dubai deal slipping past our radar. Inchcape Shipping Services (ISS) a British firm bought in January by a Dubai government investment vehicle. ISS has a $50 million contract with the U.S. Navy and provides maritime services at more than a dozen U.S. ports.
"ISS also arranges everything from fuel to fresh vegetables for naval vessels at Middle Eastern ports, and is believed to get Navy docking schedules in advance---data that could be invaluable to terrorists."
And, just who signed off on this deal? Why the U. S. Treasury Department although they would not tell TIME whether ISS's sale to Dubai was even reviewed!
Wouldn't tell...more high-handed arrogance from the Bush administration!
Here is the ISS website: http://sweb.iss-shipping.com/
The ports they service in the U.S. are: Aberdeen, Alameda, Anacorts, all Alaska ports, Albany, Alexandria, all Delaware River ports and anchorages, all Texas ports and Lake Charles, LA.
"A Homeland Security official told TIME there is a 'big, gaping hole' in vetting workers--at ISS and other firms--for access to ports."
Remember what else happened in January? David Sanborn who ran Dubai Ports World European and Latin American operations was tapped by Bush to head the U. S. Maritime Administration.
Cozy little arrangements aren't they.
Don't let the Bush administration spin the life out of this ports issue. Our collective voices stopped the deal, and our continued pressure may blow the lid off of this entire can of worms.
But common sense, and truthful motives, are in short supply in the Bush administration. We are now in a tornado of Dubai World Ports and United Arab Emirates spin by the Bush administration.
We are being told that Americans who object to this deal are Arab and Muslim bashing bigots. That we are destroying our trade relations with the Middle Eastern world. That Dubai Ports World used to support terrorist states, but since 9/11 they are our fast friends (see my "UAE Not US Supporter Since 9/11" and "Portsgate: Public Outrage be Damned" blogs). And most absurd, that there are more important issues.
More important than the security of our ports and borders?
According to a small article in the recent TIME magazine, there is yet another Dubai deal slipping past our radar. Inchcape Shipping Services (ISS) a British firm bought in January by a Dubai government investment vehicle. ISS has a $50 million contract with the U.S. Navy and provides maritime services at more than a dozen U.S. ports.
"ISS also arranges everything from fuel to fresh vegetables for naval vessels at Middle Eastern ports, and is believed to get Navy docking schedules in advance---data that could be invaluable to terrorists."
And, just who signed off on this deal? Why the U. S. Treasury Department although they would not tell TIME whether ISS's sale to Dubai was even reviewed!
Wouldn't tell...more high-handed arrogance from the Bush administration!
Here is the ISS website: http://sweb.iss-shipping.com/
The ports they service in the U.S. are: Aberdeen, Alameda, Anacorts, all Alaska ports, Albany, Alexandria, all Delaware River ports and anchorages, all Texas ports and Lake Charles, LA.
"A Homeland Security official told TIME there is a 'big, gaping hole' in vetting workers--at ISS and other firms--for access to ports."
Remember what else happened in January? David Sanborn who ran Dubai Ports World European and Latin American operations was tapped by Bush to head the U. S. Maritime Administration.
Cozy little arrangements aren't they.
Don't let the Bush administration spin the life out of this ports issue. Our collective voices stopped the deal, and our continued pressure may blow the lid off of this entire can of worms.
Tuesday, March 14, 2006
Bush and Putin Tradeoffs
"He has tightened controls over the legislature and made it difficult for any political opponents to gain traction....and denied the judicial system real independence."
So who is this?
Did your guess President George Bush?
No, not Bush, this the New York Times on March 13 summing up the stranglehold President Vladimir Putin is exerting on Russia.
This summer in St. Petersburg Putin of will host the Group of 8, the world's most powerful democracies. Putin hopes to successfully join this elite group.
In a recent report, U. S. Council on Foreign Relations task force has suggested that the Bush administration rethink its partnership with Russia in the face of Putin's continuing and increasing exertion of government control. Some members of the council, though, argue that the United States should "cold-bloodedly" cooperate on important matters and consider "what goes on inside Russia to be Russia's business."
So does this "What happens in Vegas stays in Vegas" attitude on foreign policy apply to other countries too? Depends on who you are. Yes to China, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. No to Iran and Korea.
Maybe Bush should direct his next state-of-the-world message to the freedom-suppressed Russian people....oops, the Putin administration has taken over the national television networks.
So, does Bush see how Putin is thwarting democracy and increasing government control in Russia? Like questionable elections, a vast new terrorism bureacy, diminution of civil rights.....oh, that's the United States under the Bush administration.
Anyway, Bush needs Putin's cooperation, especially on Iran. Does membership in the Group of 8 represent the trade-off?
March 12 to 18 is national Sunshine Week. This is an initiative by news media and watchdog groups to focus on the importance of open government. Our real chance for Sunshine in government is possible only if we break the Bush/GOP oligarchy starting this November. Vote!
So who is this?
Did your guess President George Bush?
No, not Bush, this the New York Times on March 13 summing up the stranglehold President Vladimir Putin is exerting on Russia.
This summer in St. Petersburg Putin of will host the Group of 8, the world's most powerful democracies. Putin hopes to successfully join this elite group.
In a recent report, U. S. Council on Foreign Relations task force has suggested that the Bush administration rethink its partnership with Russia in the face of Putin's continuing and increasing exertion of government control. Some members of the council, though, argue that the United States should "cold-bloodedly" cooperate on important matters and consider "what goes on inside Russia to be Russia's business."
So does this "What happens in Vegas stays in Vegas" attitude on foreign policy apply to other countries too? Depends on who you are. Yes to China, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. No to Iran and Korea.
Maybe Bush should direct his next state-of-the-world message to the freedom-suppressed Russian people....oops, the Putin administration has taken over the national television networks.
So, does Bush see how Putin is thwarting democracy and increasing government control in Russia? Like questionable elections, a vast new terrorism bureacy, diminution of civil rights.....oh, that's the United States under the Bush administration.
Anyway, Bush needs Putin's cooperation, especially on Iran. Does membership in the Group of 8 represent the trade-off?
March 12 to 18 is national Sunshine Week. This is an initiative by news media and watchdog groups to focus on the importance of open government. Our real chance for Sunshine in government is possible only if we break the Bush/GOP oligarchy starting this November. Vote!
Monday, March 13, 2006
Our No-Account Government
Columnist Richard Cohen said it so well:
"It was a chat about a religious moment that purportedly bonded Bush to Vladimir Putin, the Russian leader of increasingly dictatorial bent. It's as if Putin, an ex-KGB spy, read Bush's file -- and conned him. He knew Bush would rather believe than think -- and that others in the administration, who knew better, would simply go along."
Yes, others would go along. And some would set the course. Vice President Dick Cheney took the helm.
The symbolic moment the "American people" (as the Republicans so fruitfully coined the hapless electorate) lost control of their government was in the spring of 2001 when Cheney was allowed to formulate energy policy behind closed doors as his task force meet with executives from big oil companies and their lobbyists from the U. S. Oil and Gas Association.
We lost control when we, and our elected representatives, allowed Cheney to refuse to release the list of task force meeting attendees. The Washington Post in 2005 finally did uncover some names based on records kept by the Secret Service.
These task force advisors read like a oil industry Who's Who: Chairman of Conoco (before the merge with Phillips) Archie Dunham, Royal Dutch/Shell Group chairman Sir Mark Moody-Stuart, Shell Oil chairman Steven Miller, BP regional president Bob Malone and Exxon VP James Rouse to name a few.
A joint hearing of the Senate Energy and Commerce committees was held in November of 2005 to look into the Cheney energy task force after pressure from environmental groups who complained they were shut out of task force discussions while big oil was not.
Commerce Chairman Ted Stevens, a Republican from oil-rich Alaska, insisted the oil executives not be under oath when they testified before the committee and had his way over the protest of committee Democrats. The resultant farce of a perjury-proof oversight investigation uncovered nothing.
This is how we lost control of our government. A government without transparency, accountability or oversight.
This is how we got our disasterous energy, defense, education, social and other policies.
In the spring of 2001, the administration closed the doors of government while Bush cycled on, depending on faith to set his course. He took us into a blind alley.
"It was a chat about a religious moment that purportedly bonded Bush to Vladimir Putin, the Russian leader of increasingly dictatorial bent. It's as if Putin, an ex-KGB spy, read Bush's file -- and conned him. He knew Bush would rather believe than think -- and that others in the administration, who knew better, would simply go along."
Yes, others would go along. And some would set the course. Vice President Dick Cheney took the helm.
The symbolic moment the "American people" (as the Republicans so fruitfully coined the hapless electorate) lost control of their government was in the spring of 2001 when Cheney was allowed to formulate energy policy behind closed doors as his task force meet with executives from big oil companies and their lobbyists from the U. S. Oil and Gas Association.
We lost control when we, and our elected representatives, allowed Cheney to refuse to release the list of task force meeting attendees. The Washington Post in 2005 finally did uncover some names based on records kept by the Secret Service.
These task force advisors read like a oil industry Who's Who: Chairman of Conoco (before the merge with Phillips) Archie Dunham, Royal Dutch/Shell Group chairman Sir Mark Moody-Stuart, Shell Oil chairman Steven Miller, BP regional president Bob Malone and Exxon VP James Rouse to name a few.
A joint hearing of the Senate Energy and Commerce committees was held in November of 2005 to look into the Cheney energy task force after pressure from environmental groups who complained they were shut out of task force discussions while big oil was not.
Commerce Chairman Ted Stevens, a Republican from oil-rich Alaska, insisted the oil executives not be under oath when they testified before the committee and had his way over the protest of committee Democrats. The resultant farce of a perjury-proof oversight investigation uncovered nothing.
This is how we lost control of our government. A government without transparency, accountability or oversight.
This is how we got our disasterous energy, defense, education, social and other policies.
In the spring of 2001, the administration closed the doors of government while Bush cycled on, depending on faith to set his course. He took us into a blind alley.
Saturday, March 11, 2006
Bush Slash and Burn Agenda
The Bush administration strategy for implementing its agenda seems clear.
Slash and burn!
Go full speed ahead on all fronts knowing that while some things may be stopped, vast chunks of their agenda will get through. In this way they are quickly, and with total indifference to public outrage, dismantling years of progress in social policy, financial accountability, international relations and respect for the rule of law.
Just look at the damage from the audacious Bush agenda...the national debt and trade deficit, education, the environment, science, borders and ports, social programs, individual rights and freedoms, separation of church and state, defense policy, human rights....an all out assault!
No accountability. No transparency. Lots of propaganda and just plain lies.
Take the now infamous UAE's Dubai Ports World deal for operations in 24 U.S. seaports, the Financial Times reports today that "A person close to the deal said last night that DP World would not necessarily sell all of its interest in P&O's U.S. assets and could retain as much as 49 per cent." http://news.ft.com/cms/s/007970e0-b053-11da-a142-0000779e2340.html
We wondered about the tricky wording in DP World's press release last week that said they would "transfer" control.
The Bush administration is relentless in the pursuit of its interests, we have to be equally relentless in the pursuit of ours . Verify then trust....then keep verifying!
For example, did you know EPA's Toxics Release Inventory program is being changed to make it easier for companies to pollute? Bush's EPA is proposing three detrimental changes that could go into effect within the next year.
Polluters could release 10 times more toxic chemicals without disclosing the volume or where it went; companies could conceal releases of up to 500 pounds annually of particularly dangerous toxic materials like PCB's, lead and mercury which can accumulate in people's bodies; and, the current annual reporting requirement would be changed to every two years. Here's the full story: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/10/opinion/10jeffords.html?ex=1142226000&en=23022172eef977c8&ei=5070
And this disclosure doesn't even scratch the surface of the Bush administration outrages!
Back to the ports deal. Why would UAE and the Bush administration be so dug in on this? After all, the U.S. portion of the P&O takeover represents only 10 per cent of the total package. The financial exposure this represents to UAE is chump change to them.
And, the Bush administration by stubbornly defending this indefensible security risk to our ports, is further destroying the trust of the electorate and gutting his GOP backing in both houses of Congress.
Puzzling. There obviously is more to this deal than meets the eye. Oil and money? Positioning for a wider war in the Middle East? One World Order? We can only guess as policies are formulated behind closed doors.
I can only echo the recent frustration of entertainers Tim McGraw and Faith Hill as they viewed the Bush administration's inept and inadequate relief and cleanup efforts in the wake of Hurricane Katrina....... "Vote!"
Slash and burn!
Go full speed ahead on all fronts knowing that while some things may be stopped, vast chunks of their agenda will get through. In this way they are quickly, and with total indifference to public outrage, dismantling years of progress in social policy, financial accountability, international relations and respect for the rule of law.
Just look at the damage from the audacious Bush agenda...the national debt and trade deficit, education, the environment, science, borders and ports, social programs, individual rights and freedoms, separation of church and state, defense policy, human rights....an all out assault!
No accountability. No transparency. Lots of propaganda and just plain lies.
Take the now infamous UAE's Dubai Ports World deal for operations in 24 U.S. seaports, the Financial Times reports today that "A person close to the deal said last night that DP World would not necessarily sell all of its interest in P&O's U.S. assets and could retain as much as 49 per cent." http://news.ft.com/cms/s/007970e0-b053-11da-a142-0000779e2340.html
We wondered about the tricky wording in DP World's press release last week that said they would "transfer" control.
The Bush administration is relentless in the pursuit of its interests, we have to be equally relentless in the pursuit of ours . Verify then trust....then keep verifying!
For example, did you know EPA's Toxics Release Inventory program is being changed to make it easier for companies to pollute? Bush's EPA is proposing three detrimental changes that could go into effect within the next year.
Polluters could release 10 times more toxic chemicals without disclosing the volume or where it went; companies could conceal releases of up to 500 pounds annually of particularly dangerous toxic materials like PCB's, lead and mercury which can accumulate in people's bodies; and, the current annual reporting requirement would be changed to every two years. Here's the full story: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/10/opinion/10jeffords.html?ex=1142226000&en=23022172eef977c8&ei=5070
And this disclosure doesn't even scratch the surface of the Bush administration outrages!
Back to the ports deal. Why would UAE and the Bush administration be so dug in on this? After all, the U.S. portion of the P&O takeover represents only 10 per cent of the total package. The financial exposure this represents to UAE is chump change to them.
And, the Bush administration by stubbornly defending this indefensible security risk to our ports, is further destroying the trust of the electorate and gutting his GOP backing in both houses of Congress.
Puzzling. There obviously is more to this deal than meets the eye. Oil and money? Positioning for a wider war in the Middle East? One World Order? We can only guess as policies are formulated behind closed doors.
I can only echo the recent frustration of entertainers Tim McGraw and Faith Hill as they viewed the Bush administration's inept and inadequate relief and cleanup efforts in the wake of Hurricane Katrina....... "Vote!"
Friday, March 10, 2006
Norton-Abramoff-McCain Connection
Interior Secretary Gale Norton just handed in her resignation.
She said the reasons had nothing to do with anything except she just wanted to refocus her life on the private sector.
Hmmmmm.
So, does any of this sound like a good reason to go....
...."last year, Norton's name came up during an investigation into lobbyist Jack Abramoff, who was accused of bilking Indian tribes out of millions of dollars while they sought favorable Interior Department decisions on casinos.
The Senate Indian Affairs Committee uncovered e-mails suggesting a one-time Norton associate, Italia Federici, tried to act as a conduit for Abramoff, helping arrange meetings with Norton or her former top deputy and passing information back and forth.
Indian Affairs Committee Chairman Sen. John McCain, however, said he found no evidence that Norton had done anything wrong." http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11763207/
Hot potato, hot potato!! Time to leave dodge.
Also news to me that McCain chairs the Indian Affairs Committee. Whoops!
She said the reasons had nothing to do with anything except she just wanted to refocus her life on the private sector.
Hmmmmm.
So, does any of this sound like a good reason to go....
...."last year, Norton's name came up during an investigation into lobbyist Jack Abramoff, who was accused of bilking Indian tribes out of millions of dollars while they sought favorable Interior Department decisions on casinos.
The Senate Indian Affairs Committee uncovered e-mails suggesting a one-time Norton associate, Italia Federici, tried to act as a conduit for Abramoff, helping arrange meetings with Norton or her former top deputy and passing information back and forth.
Indian Affairs Committee Chairman Sen. John McCain, however, said he found no evidence that Norton had done anything wrong." http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11763207/
Hot potato, hot potato!! Time to leave dodge.
Also news to me that McCain chairs the Indian Affairs Committee. Whoops!
Thursday, March 09, 2006
Bush is Listing to Port
The United Arab Emirates issued a press release today regarding the takeover of seaports in the United States by Dubai Ports World.
"DP World has decided to transfer fully the U.S. operation of P&O Operations North America to a United States entity,” DP World announced in a statement that Sen. John Warner, a Republican from VA, read on the floor of the Senate today. The announcement did not specify which American company would be involved.
Sen. Charles Schumer, Democrat from NY, has been in the vanguard of the protest of this takeover by a foreign government. While pleased with the news, Schumer nonetheless says he will closely review the release bearing in mind that the "devil is in the details."
Verify then trust!
"DP World has decided to transfer fully the U.S. operation of P&O Operations North America to a United States entity,” DP World announced in a statement that Sen. John Warner, a Republican from VA, read on the floor of the Senate today. The announcement did not specify which American company would be involved.
Sen. Charles Schumer, Democrat from NY, has been in the vanguard of the protest of this takeover by a foreign government. While pleased with the news, Schumer nonetheless says he will closely review the release bearing in mind that the "devil is in the details."
Verify then trust!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)